Amazon, Best Buy, Wal-mart, eBay and Target were among the web sites most often visited by consumers during the holiday shopping season, according to Majestic Research Corp.’s Holiday Shopping Survey released yesterday.
More than 50% of the 300 consumers surveyed by Majestic reported visiting Amazon.com, regardless of whether they made a purchase. More than 45% said they had visited eBay, Wal-Mart and Best Buy.
85% of visitors to Amazon and eBay said they went directly to the sites, while 82% of visitors to Victoria’s Secret and Target said they went directly to those sites, according to Majestic.
More than 50% of visitors to eBay and Amazon said they had completed at least one transaction since the beginning of the holiday season, compared to the average 22% among all web sites included, according to the survey. Among those responding to the survey, only 10% of eBay’s and 17% of Amazon’s customers were first-time buyers.
The survey also found that shoppers who were aware of shipping discounts on a site were more likely to make purchases at the site. While 54% of Amazon.com visitors made holiday purchases at the site, 70% of visitors who were aware of shipping discounts completed at least one purchase. At Overstock.com, the proportion of visitors making purchases rose to 41% from 23% among those who were aware of shipping discounts, Majestic said.
Shipping promotions on Amazon.com were the most commonly noticed, with 63% of visitors saying they were aware of shipping promotions on the site. 47% of Overstock visitors indicated they were aware of shipping discounts—which were as low $1—at the site.
Friday, December 23, 2005
Amazon.com’s “Brand” is Important
Thursday, December 22, 2005
eBay EachNet Offers “Free” Listings
Those listings will now show up in search results after auction and Buy-it-Now items. In addition, eBay EachNet will waive fees for a seller’s first three listings each month and will waive the final value fee for any transaction that uses PayPal or eBay’s escrow system Au Fu Tong.
Wonder if eBay EachNet will eliminate fees entirely and head towards a paid listings model?
Monday, December 19, 2005
Google Cubes; Akamai Drops 5%
Here are some parts from his report. It's quite interesting, if true.
GOOGLE, THE HARDWARE COMPANY. In a recent conversation with renown technology pundit, Robert X. Cringely, we discussed some very intriguing potential hardware moves by Google that could have a profound implication on not only Google, but potentially the Internet and media in general. We particularly find these potential products interesting, as most investors think of Google as a software / programming company, and little discussion has taken place on Wall Street regarding Google as also a hardware company. Should these potential products from Google materialize, this will change.
GOOGLE DATA CENTER CONTAINERS – At Google’s investor conference earlier in the year, we had a chance to ask Eric Schmidt about Google’s job posting for someone to help in purchasing dark fiber. Many investors were unclear as to why Google would need dark fiber, but the obvious answer was Google was looking to connect its data centers cheaply. This made sense, but we were left wondering if there was more to the job search. Since then Google has been very active buying up fiber, and Mr. Cringely has hypothesized (http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20051117.html) what Google may be experimenting with: building a data center that fit with in a standard shipping container. The 20’ x 40’ container could be packed with almost 5000 Opteron processors and over 3.5 petabytes of disk storage. While this packs a lot of power, it wouldn’t outsize any of Google’s current 64 data centers (up from just one only 2 data centers 2 years ago). So what would make these data center containers so special? They could be dropped off literally overnight to any of the 300 Internet peering points globally. Many may wonder what benefit so many access points would bring to Google besides redundancy. The answer is speed – or reduced latency. Google could be closer to the end user than anyone ever was before. There are many applications that would benefit from this: Google Videos and IPTV sitting just a hop or two from the user, virtual office applications with robust features (i.e. running desktop applications on the Internet itself with very fast interactive features like interactive 3D maps), servers would never “go down”, and data would never get “lost”. In essence, the company could build its own Google Net, which would sit right on top of today’s Internet. Google would basically have an access point in every major city which would add two other benefits: 1) it could prioritize its own VOIP, for premier telephony experience; 2) it would reduce Google’s dependence on other 3rd parties for trunking or access. But could Google afford it? To build and operate the containers annually, it would only cost about $2-3B, readily done with over $7B of cash on the balance sheet, (and still plenty of room even if Google invests in AOL for $1B (see below)).
GOOGLE CUBES: THE LAST MILE – In our conversations with Mr. Cringely, it appears that this may not be all that Google has up its sleeve on hardware. While Google is potentially thinking “big”, it may also be thinking “small”, “very small”. Through our conversations, we have learned that Google may be considering developing Google Cubes (we have dubbed them this, as we are not sure what they could be called). Basically the device would be a small box with many connections ports on it, in addition to wireless (Bluetooth / WiFi). Its potential purpose: it could connect to your TV or PC, or PVR, or stereo. As long as one of them is connected to a broadband connection, the Cubes could form a mini mesh home network. What could this enable? Many things – the obvious applications would include: enabling IPTV to easily connect from the web to your TV and enabling the transfer of video downloads from the computer to the TV, enabling easy transferal of MP3s on your computer to your stereo (or vice versa), and VOIP connection to all existing phones in your home. However, the cubes could potentially work with your home security or even your home climate controls (imagine turning your air conditioning on in your home right before you leave work so that your house is cooler when you arrive, and you didn’t waste money cooling it all day). Now imagine that you live in an apartment complex and the neighbors wanted to share 1 broadband connection – all the neighbors cubes could “talk” to each other (if desired). However, should this be in Google’s plans, it would take a lot of network support – enter another role of the widely distributed data center containers. One could even fathom the cubes (or one main cube) talking directly to a nearby data center container, which could eliminate the “last mile” problem completely. The idea sounds intriguing but what would it cost? The cubes would be designed to be as “dumb” as possible (which is the whole point of making the network the computer), and Google would probably subsidize them so that they cost <$20 or maybe even free (like AOL CDs).
HARDWARE CONCLUSION: We underscore to investors that for now, any potential development by Google of data center shipping containers and Google Cubes has not been confirmed. However, one could see how these ideas could prove interesting to Google, should they be feasible. Further, we think that at minimum investors should takeaway from this that Google is not just a software / programming company. In fact, Google could over time become more of a hardware company than anything else. At the very least, we think investors should at least consider these possibilities.
Saturday, December 17, 2005
Answers.com on the rise
Recent wins with the NY Public library and FireFox increase my conviction that this company can one day rise from relative obscurity. The acquisition of Brainboost should help the business model evolve. I assume the NY Public library win will encourage other public library systems across the country to work with the company. Answers.com has an unofficial relationship with Google, which I think may lead to a formal relationship or an acquisition down the road. The stock has been somewhat volatile, trading between 9 and 14 over the past few months. But I think with the recent news there will be more stability in the stock price. Over the next year, the stock will trade largely on catalysts instead of fundamentals. After that I think that fundamentals will start to drive the stock as the rapid revenue growth, which I think looks sustainable, will start to add to the bottom line. Keep this stock on your radar.
3Q Results are highlighted below:
In the third quarter, the company generated $563,576, compared to $424,552 in the second quarter of 2005, or 33% sequential growth, and compared with $53,163, for the corresponding quarter a year earlier. The net loss in the third quarter of 2005 was $1,090,355, compared to a net loss of $1,601,986, for the second quarter of 2005, and compared to a net loss in the corresponding period of 2004 of $2,168,527. Management expects fourth quarter 2005 revenues to climb sequentially by 42% - 55% from the third quarter of 2005 to approximately $800,000 to $875,000. Of this, over 95% will be from Answers.com proprietary traffic and distribution channels. The remainder will be from subscriptions previously sold and other income. Further, the company expects to increase its operating expenses relating to growing its business and internal operations and therefore anticipates the fourth quarter net operating loss to approximate or be moderately higher than the third quarter.